Channel development consultancy Channel Dynamics recently threw its fifteenth birthday party in Sydney. CRN convened an all-star panel before the event swung into gear, to look back at what has changed over 15 years and what might come next.
We started by asking how the channel has evolved since 2004, when Channel Dynamics first opened its doors.
Moheb Moses, Channel Dynamics: Across 15 years, the thing that constantly changes is technology. But what has stayed the same is that every time we have a major technology shift, the analysts predict that the channel will become irrelevant and disappear.
But the other thing that changes is the channel itself, because it adapts and continues to survive. When I look at what the channel does today, compared to 15 years ago, it’s completely different.
For 15 years, I’ve also heard people talk about how distribution is going to disappear or die. Personally I don't see it. It will change, but the function of distribution - to aggregate the fulfilment of products or services in a more efficient manner, in order to reduce the burden on the vendors or partners - is still relevant.
Phil Cameron, Westcon Comstor: I know lots of small guys doing Internet of Things distribution. They are going to get bought.
You have to look at the macro in the situation with global growth slowing down. Australian GDP was at 2.8 percent last year, it’s forecast at 1.7 percent this year. These companies have to get growth from somewhere. You've seen it on the vendor side and the distribution side.
Karen Drewitt, The Missing Link: The distributors we have seen that have not been successful came when they were completely focussed on the tech, not about the style of company, the clients, the staff, all the things that are really integral to successful mergers and acquisitions.
Cam Wayland, Channel Dynamics: It’s also about defining what value add to that particular audience. If you look at what value add is and go back 15 years what they’re doing has changed considerably. Now it is about aggregating clouds and trying to make sense of all of the software-as-a-service, whereas before it was who is your backend supported by as a distributor, and who did drop ship or did you have it in stock and was credit available. I think that's where the model for value add has changed tremendously.
THE AGE OF OUTCOMES
The conversation considered how partners have moved from selling hardware to addressing business outcomes.
Paul Harapin, Domo: I like the word ‘outcome’ because that is really the difference between my days at VMware to what we are doing now at Domo.
My partners now make money delivering outcomes with our software.
You can transact directly, I don't really care. That's the majority of the conversations that we've had. Using the word outcome is where I see the partners that I'm dealing with materialise.
Karen Drewitt: Even contracts now are quite different than how they used to be. They are outcome-based. They are all around what customers are getting!
Ronnie Altit, Insentra: It has sort of waxed and waned. You had the all-singing, all-dancing integrator who would make all of this complex stuff work for you.
And now we're heading way more towards specialist partners. The tech has now become so much more complex, it is very hard to be deeply capable across all. For us at Insentra it creates a lot of opportunities. By way of example, you get these focussed partners who all they know is, say, Microsoft Dynamics but their customers need Azure or AWS and they have no skills to deliver so they choose to partner – thankfully often with us!!
You’ve still got the big integrators but the new partners are laser-focused.
Paul Harapin: It reflects what we are looking for. We did a session a couple of weeks ago and asked my partner team to write a job spec for a partner.
The two things that came out as most important were vertical specialty and solution specialty.
Tasha Soltonovich, Ingram Micro: The cloud resellers that we have say ‘This is the kind of customer we want.’ And if you if you don't fit into that, here, I'll recommend another reseller because they want to specialise.
Steve Martin, NEXTDC: It’s also about the market you are addressing. If you're going after that hundred-seat business, it needs strategic IT advice. A thousand seat business needs specialist advice for different projects.
Cam Wayland: The number one thing that we try and teach partner managers and vendors is ‘What is the customer that the partner is addressing?’ because the partner looks like its customers. There's a big difference addressing an SMB versus an enterprise customer. They have different resources and cost base and everything.
THE BIG SHIFT
Attendees also considered big industry shifts that have changed the way the channel needs to sell – and who you sell to.
Phil Cameron: I go back a little longer than some of you. I was basically running the PC business for Toshiba and we convinced the market to buy a new notebook because of Y2K. The world was going to blow up!
We filled warehouses with them.
And then the customers felt like they had been suckered. So what we saw was the buying power shifted from the vendor to the partner to the customer.
Moheb Moses: And in 2004 we were still in the aftermath of Y2K.
Phil Cameron: 2001 was a recession. In 2001 I was letting people go!
Leo Lynch, StorageCraft: You know what other company was formed in 2004? Facebook.
And that was the start of users creating more content than corporates and that data then being managed by third parties. By the Googles and Facebooks.
Moheb Moses: One of the biggest changes of the last 15 years is social media. It existed in a very basic form, but no-one really understood the potential of platforms like LinkedIn (or Twitter) and how they would completely change functions like marketing and hiring.
Karen Drewitt: If you think about the different functions in the business, the function that has had the biggest change is marketing.
Leo Lynch: Chief marketing officers (CMOs) now have bigger budgets than chief information officers. They bring more value to the business.
Ronnie Altit: That transition selling to the CMO hasn’t happened yet. Partners are doing it, but not for general IT. They are typically doing it to sell CRM to the marketing department.
Steve Martin: Board-level outcomes.
Simon Sharwood, CRN: With my iTnews.com.au hat on, that user wants an outcome, and they can’t wait for IT to deliver it. And when that user buys, it’s all software-as-a-service.
Paul Harapin: We are all trying to do that but it is a really difficult balance, to get the right team. You need someone to have a conversation with a CEO, a CMO and a CIO. And when you're talking SaaS and a fair bit of transformation, many of the CIOs are still resistant to change.
It can be the same conversation we had 15 years ago with VMware when someone managing 1,000 servers that had 50 people and was an important person.
Once you virtualise down to two servers, you're not so important.
It took a while to get through that cycle and then everything readjusts and you don’t have that role of server manager.
Not everyone can get people who have great conversations with the marketing department and in front of an enterprise CIO.
-1.jpg&w=100&c=1&s=0)
.png&w=100&c=1&s=0)
