Rick Whiting and Joseph F. Kovar
From the solution provider perspective, IBM Corp. is looking very different in 2008 given the restructurings of the Small and Midsize Business Group and the Systems and Technology Group announced earlier this month. IBM said all these changes will sharpen its SMB focus and make the giant company easier – and more profitable – for channel partners to work with. But will the changes at IBM bring real benefits for solution providers, or is this just another redrawing of the corporate “org chart”?
IBM is hoping the changes will spur sales of its servers, software and storage products, particularly those within its Express Advantage portfolio. The company’s server sales, in particular, could use a boost: a Gartner report in November said IBM’s server sales fell 6.5 percent in the third quarter of 2007 to $1.5 billion, while IBM rivals Dell Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Co. both gained in server sales.
The reorganisation of the Small and Midsize Business Group will likely have the biggest impact on channel partners. In the past, sales reps from the SMB Group, despite its name, sold to companies ranging from those with fewer than 1000 employees up to customers with thousands, even tens of thousands of employees. The result was that sales reps, channel resources and even channel partners often spent a lot of time and effort chasing a small number of big sales opportunities within their designated sales territory and not devoting enough to hundreds of smaller opportunities, said Steve Solazzo, general manager of the SMB Group, in a recent interview at IBM’s Armonk, New York headquarters.
“Any time one of those very large customers has a big opportunity, the attention of not only my face-to-face sellers but also some of [our] business partners goes to those large enterprise customers,” Solazzo said. “As a result ... the attention goes away from those 200 to 300 midmarket customers who are covered in the territory as well.”
Now the SMB organisation, renamed the General Business Group, has been divided into an Enterprise Business Unit that’s focusing on enterprise customers and the Midmarket Business Unit that’s concentrating on developing midrange customer opportunities. That may sound like little more than a redrawing of the IBM corporate organisational chart, but there are substantive differences that impact solution providers.
Most direct sales resources within the General Business Group will reside within the Enterprise Business Unit, focusing on the relatively small number of large-company opportunities. IBM, meanwhile, is promising to devote more resources to its midmarket efforts. That includes spending $100 million this year for lead generation and other co-marketing efforts with solution providers targeting SMBs. IBM is also shifting telecoverage resources to the midmarket efforts, including assigning channel partners to telecoverage sales reps who will help develop and qualify sales leads. Each telecoverage rep will have a defined set of 100 to 125 channel partner accounts. IBM is also creating new midmarket territory sales rep positions to work with channel partners and telecoverage personnel to identify and develop SMB sales opportunities.
The New Year order
By
Staff Writers
on Mar 6, 2008 2:02PM
Page 1 of 2 | Single page
Got a news tip for our journalists? Share it with us anonymously here.
Partner Content

How NinjaOne Is Supporting The Channel As It Builds An Innovative Global Partner Program

Secure, integrated platforms enable MSPs to focus bringing powerful solutions to customers

Channel can help lead customers to boosting workplace wellbeing with professional headsets

Kaseya Dattocon APAC 2024 is Back

Build cybersecurity capability with award winning Fortinet training from Ingram Micro
Sponsored Whitepapers

Easing the burden of Microsoft CSP management
-1.jpg&w=100&c=1&s=0)
Stop Fraud Before It Starts: A Must-Read Guide for Safer Customer Communications

The Cybersecurity Playbook for Partners in Asia Pacific and Japan

Pulseway Essential Eight Framework

7 Best Practices For Implementing Human Risk Management