Software developer Socialtext officially became open source last week when the Open Source Initiative (OSI) officially approved the Common Public Attribution Licence (CPAL) for its wiki software.
Socialtext submitted the CPAL in June, causing something of a stir in the open source community. The licence has been likened to so called ‘badgeware’, often used by non-OSI approved open source companies.
It requires that companies employing open source make the origin of the code clear, usually by displaying a logo attributed to the source company.
Many fear that open source users will end up having to display a dizzying array of logos, or else pay the companies a fee to avoid doing so.
Some proponents of the licence claim that it is an attack on companies that use open source code without attribution and don’t give anything back to the open source community.
It is also thought that larger companies will devote a considerable amount of time and resources to developing their own code to get around the clauses in the licence, even though the code required may have already been written.
Open source attribution licence approved
Got a news tip for our journalists? Share it with us anonymously here.
Add techpartner.news as your trusted source
Partner Content
Think Technology Australia deliver massive ROI to a Toyota dealership through SharePoint-powered, automated document management
_(25).jpg&h=142&w=230&c=1&s=1)
Shortfalls in cyber expertise deepen the cost and complexity of security incidents
Promoted Content
Why Most MSPs Are Invisible (And What the Smart Ones Are Doing Instead)
_(30).jpg&h=142&w=230&c=1&s=1)
Promoted Content
Why Australia’s Industrial Leaders Are Turning to Dynamic Aspect for Dynamics 365 Business Central
Promoted Content
Have ticket queues become your quiet business risk?
.jpg&w=100&c=1&s=0){kind=logo}
