Hyro spins off Idaptive identity business

Digital services provider Hyro has formally separated its Idaptive identity and access management product division as a separate trading entity as its board considers selling the asset.

ASX-listed Hyro, which employed around 170 staff, today acts as the sales arm for Idaptive, but plans to go to market through other systems integrators to broaden the product’s reach, the company said.

It has returned to profitable trading after running up considerable debts during the global financial crisis, having focused its product development efforts in recent years on identity and access management and reduced R&D efforts in less commercially active areas.

Hyro chief executive officer Bill Votsaris said the company had previously invested in a “wide spread of technologies” and racked up a debt that was “almost equal to the revenue of the business”.

During its restructure, the company made a $10 million bet on its Idaptive software, an investment Votsaris said was starting to pay off.

“Like any product development in software, it takes years to earn a dividend. Now we are in that stage,” he said.

Votsaris said the Idaptive product competed on a global level with solutions from IBM, CA and Oracle, winning “sizeable contracts” with enterprise customers such as Air New Zealand and Victoria’s Department of Education.

The latter deal saw the department drop Oracle’s Identity Access Management Module for Idaptive, despite using a $60 million Oracle platform for its 1.5 million subscribers.

Votsaris said that Hyro has registered Idaptive and its twenty full-time staff as a wholly-owned subsidiary and commenced the “first rounds of negotiations with major systems integrators".

The 150 remaining Hyro staff will focus on digital content delivery, he said, but will nonetheless remain “one of Idaptive’s systems integrators”.

Now the Hyro board is considering “altering Idaptive’s ownership” to distance the two companies further, he said.

The spin-off was not about raising cash, he said.

“Idaptive is profitable, its licensing fees are higher than its costs,” Votsaris said.

“It’s just that a product company [like Idaptive] is different to a services and systems integrator [like Hyro]. It’s more of a global opportunity and it needs the right ownership and partnership model.

"The first step was to have the people in the product company in a separate entity. Now it’s a wholly-owned subsidiary – over the next six months we will potentially change that.”